[FADPUpdate] Letters to the Editor
melliott3 at aol.com
melliott3 at aol.com
Mon Dec 10 18:33:48 EST 2007
Friends,
Letters to the Editor are a quick and effective way to get your views
in front of thousands of people, including Florida's leaders. It is
crucial that YOUR opinion be heard.
Make your efforts count! Make known both your concerns and your hopes.
Now is the time.
Every major Florida newspaper prints Letters to the Editor. They can
be sent in by email, fax, phone and mail. The best chance to have a
letter printed is in response to a specific news article, event or
editorial. Published letters are short and to the point. There are
numerous opportunities to respond with your views on the Death Penalty.
Upcoming newsworthy events that are favorable for having your letters
published: Thursday, Dec. 13, the New Jersey State Assembly will vote
on repealing the Death Penalty and Dec. 18, the United Nations General
Assembly is set to vote on a resolution calling for a worldwide
moratorium on the Death Penalty.
Your letters to the Editor make a difference.
Shine the light,
Mark
Gov. Charlie Crist and Attorney General Bill McCollum think Letters to
the Editor are important...They write them!
Read the following editorial from the St. Pete Times and the Letter to
the Editor sent by Crist and McCollum. Please also read the response
letter from concerned Floridian, Lucy Fuchs.
******************************************
St. Petersburg Times Editorial
Nov. 20, 2007
A POINTLESS PUSH FOR EXECUTIONS
How wrongheaded and wasteful of Gov. Charlie Crist and Attorney General
Bill McCollum to continue to push for executions when the U.S. Supreme
Court has made it clear that none will go forward until it has decided
the constitutionality of lethal injections.
Early next year, the nation's high court will hear appeals from two
death row inmates in Kentucky who claim that the three-drug lethal
cocktail used by most death penalty states has the potential to cause
undue pain and suffering. Florida uses this mix and botched the 2006
execution of Angel Diaz, who some witnesses said appeared to suffer
during the 30 minutes it took for him to die.
Since the Diaz execution, there have been changes to the state's
execution procedure but not to the chemicals. The high court's ruling
in the Kentucky cases is likely to have direct implications for
Florida. If the U.S. Supreme Court determines that this cocktail
violates the Eighth Amendment (as it should), Florida will have to
change as well.
In the meantime, the nation's high court has been imposing stays on
executions, making it quite obvious that until it decides the issue,
lethal injections are temporarily on hold nationwide. Unfortunately,
that hasn't stopped Crist and McCollum from trying to push ahead. Crist
has so far refused to issue a moratorium, and McCollum recently
appealed an Orlando federal district court's stay on the scheduled
execution of child killer Mark Dean Schwab. The stay request was fought
all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court which, of course, blocked the
execution indefinitely.
While McCollum's office says there is no way to break down the cost of
the legal battle, state taxpayers were on the hook for the state's
lawyers and for Schwab's. And a gaggle of lawyers doesn't come cheap.
Crist should impose a moratorium on executions until the Supreme Court
rules, which is expected to be by the end of its term in early summer,
if not before. Until the court lifts the cloud of legal uncertainty
over the lethal chemical mix, there is no point to pushing for
executions that will not take place.
****************************************
Letter to the Editor
Published Nov. 25, 2007
Justice should not be delayed:
Tuesday's editorial calling for a moratorium on lethal injections in
Florida was misguided on two essential points. First, there is no such
moratorium currently in place on a national level. Florida's moratorium
was lifted when the Governor's Commission on the Administration of
Lethal Injection released its recommendations for an improved process
for lethal injection, which has twice been upheld since then as humane
and effective by the Florida Supreme Court. We are confident the U.S.
Supreme Court will not invalidate those procedures.
Additionally, it is abhorrent to call fighting for Mark Dean Schwab's
execution a waste of taxpayer revenue or attorneys' resources. If fault
should be assigned for creating a public expenditure in this case, it
should be placed squarely on the shoulders of the man who kidnapped,
raped and murdered an 11-year old boy.
In March 1991, Mark Dean Schwab was released from prison after serving
a fraction of an eight-year sentence for raping a 13-year old boy at
knifepoint. Just weeks later, Schwab visited 11-year old Junny
Rios-Martinez, posing as a newspaper reporter. On April 18, 1991, 26
days after meeting Junny, Schwab called the boy's school pretending to
be his father and told Junny to meet him after school. Junny was never
seen alive again.
The Rios-Martinez family and the state of Florida have waited for
justice for nearly two decades. This case cannot be characterized in
terms of reckless litigation or by dollars and cents. It is time for
justice to be served.
Gov. Charlie Crist and Attorney General Bill McCollum, Tallahassee
**********************************************
Letter to the Editor
Published Dec. 2, 2007
In Death Penalty debate, fairness is a key concern:
Since Gov. Charlie Crist and Attorney General Bill McCollum sought to
defend themselves in the newspaper, I would like to publicly address
this to them:
Mr. Crist and Mr. McCollum:
Your concern seems to be that you are acting according to norms and
that you are not to be blamed for a waste of taxpayers' money.
I wish you would think of much larger issues than that. First, no one
is saying that Mark Schwab is a nice guy. Those of us who oppose the
death penalty abhor what he has done and hope that he spends the rest
of his life in prison. So the question is not so much concern for him
as it is concern for fairness as well as concern for ourselves.
Unfortunately there are murders committed every day in this country,
but only a few murderers get the death penalty. And they are not always
the ones guilty of the most horrible offenses. Look over the records of
those who have received the death penalty: Most are poor, badly
educated, sometimes from abusive homes. This does not excuse their
crimes; they are still criminals. But it does bring up the issue of
fairness.
Second, executions do not stop other people from committing murders.
European countries do not have the death penalty and they have fewer
murders. Even here in the United States, states that do not use the
death penalty do not have more murders.
Are you really talking about justice or are you talking about
vengeance, and anxious to make a name as being "tough on crime?"
Ultimately, killing to prove that killing is wrong brutalizes all of
us.
Lucy Fuchs, Brandon
**********************************
One year ago, December 13, 2006, the People of the State of Florida
killed Angel Diaz in a torturous, botched execution that lasted over
half an hour. His last recorded words: "The state of Florida is
killing an innocent person." Diaz said from the gurney on Death Row.
"The state of Florida is committing a crime, because I am innocent. The
death penalty is not only a form of vengeance, but also a cowardly act
by humans. I'm sorry for what is happening to me and my family who have
been put through this.''
Write a letter to the Editor. Please speak up and speak out.
Mark Elliott
Executive Director
Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, FADP.org
2840 W. Bay Drive, #118
Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770
(727)215-9646
mark at fadp.org
Please support FADP.
Please make a donation to help with expenses.
Every dollar is important.
Any amount helps.
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
More information about the FADPUpdate
mailing list